CrimsonKero's movie Reviews on Newgrounds

[MOISTUREPALOOZA]

== I think this is a little overrated ==
Overall Score: 5

I got some entertainment in this, a lot of funny jokes and writing, but you'd have to be able to stomach those really messy graphics.
I see the appeal in this style, but I feel this could've been drawn better, like, a lot better. I've seen the stuff you've done on the Art Portal in both 2D and 3D and those are great. You could've showed off your A tier shading skills here, but here, it looks like baby's first FlipaClip drawing.

Also Bruce sounds good enough, but according to @jthrash, you could've easily done that yourself, rather than hiring someone else with more recognition than yourself (which I had no idea until after you released it). To be fair, the people behind South Park have hired big name celebrities to do minor sound contributions such as hiring George Clooney to voice Stan's dog, and I see where you're going here.

Graphics: 4 | Sound: -69 | Length: 7 | Slides: 8 | Style: 10 | Humor: 8

[Lez-Bozos in 3-D!]

== OMG 3D! ==
Overall Score: 7

Nice to see some 3D here, but in my opinion, most of it is pretty stiff, even the little creepy crawlies, ie. not really animated. Also Brianne and Leslie almost sound like their 2005 incarnations

For anyone who doesn't know, the characters here are Brianne and Leslie, a lesbian couple created by Keith Stack, aka @Keith2002, who despite his recent legacy as a comic artist on Twitter, created the characters a long long time ago, with their earliest incarnations appearing in the flash "Wacky Lesbian Hour: Ep 1", which was submitted to Newgrounds in 2005.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/266810

SUGGESTED IDEAS:
Maybe some lip-syncing. and/or some captions.

Graphics: 8 | Sound: 8 | Length: 4 | Movement: 5 | Style: 10 | Humor: 8

[ORCHID PORN - Rehearsal at Hellven High]

== ORCHID PORN?? ==
Overall Score: 8

Animation's great, you're using a lot of complicated angles, you used some kickass music and the twist at the end got me, but
What Were You Thinking When Coming Up With That Title?

French Translation:
L’animation est géniale, vous utilisez beaucoup d’angles compliqués, vous avez utilisé de la musique kickass et le twist à la fin m’a attiré, mais
À quoi pensiez-vous en proposant ce titre ?

Graphics: 10 | Sound: 10 | Entertainment: 9 | Style: 10 | Hindsight: 5 | Humor: 10

[An Kid 2]

== Jank ==

Extremely stiff, clunky, low-effort and basic looking (not in a good way). Also no sound until 12 seconds in.

Graphics: 0 | Style: 0 | Sound: 1 | Entertainment: 0
Overall Score: 0

[eggs!!!]

== This is cringe! ==

UPDATE: Yes this is a remake, but it's still cringe.

It almost looks like you remade an older animation, and also switched software, but even then there's minimal improvement

BAD QUALITIES / THINGS TO FIX
- The same egg on eye then on cube animation is repeated several times for a minute
- That weird laser thing she shoots out with her hands looks like crap.
- Outlines are very messy. I can excuse the right eye over her hair as a stylistic choice, but there are spots where outlines bleed through other outlines. In addition the cube also has rough corners.
- No background
- Bland + forgettable character design
- Motions are very stiff and non-expressive
- Typos, notably 'perpouse' instead of 'purpose'

GOOD QUALITIES
+ Intro was pretty nice, but could use thinner or no outlines and further refinements.

Graphics: 3 | Style: 2 | Cringe: 10 | Improvement: 4 | Sound: 5 | Entertainment: 2
Overall Score: 4

RosieUV responds:

This was a remake of an animation I made back when I was 12 so I was trying to replicate original in my current style